HC Ruling: Soldier’s Death Due To Fever On Casual Leave Attributable To Service

Introduction

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has delivered a significant judgment affirming that the death of a soldier during casual leave due to illness is attributable to military service. The decision reinforces the principle that casual leave is treated as duty period, thereby securing the rights of widows and dependents for family pension and related benefits.

Case Background

A soldier was sanctioned casual leave from June 13, 2002, to July 2, 2002.
During this period, he developed high fever and was admitted to a hospital, where he later passed away.
His widow applied for special family pension, claiming that the death occurred while he was considered “on duty.”
The authorities initially denied the claim, stating that the soldier was on leave at the time of his death.

Legal Challenge

The widow’s claim was supported by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), which ruled in her favor.
The Union of India filed a writ petition against this decision, disputing that death on casual leave could be linked to service.
The case reached the Punjab and Haryana High Court, where a Division Bench of Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi and Justice Vikas Suri examined the matter.

Court’s Observations

Casual Leave Equals Duty:
- As per the Disability Pension in Defence Service Rules, casual leave is considered duty for all intents and purposes.
- Therefore, any mishap during casual leave must be treated as service-related.
Attributable to Service:
- The soldier’s death from high fever during casual leave is attributable to service, considering the continuous nature of military duty.
- It was not due to negligence on his part, and hence, cannot be separated from military service.
Reference to Supreme Court Law:
- The Bench cited the Supreme Court principle that even when an officer is on leave, the facts determine whether death/disability is attributable to service.
No Error in Tribunal’s Decision:
- The High Court found no infirmity in the AFT’s ruling and upheld the decision to grant special family pension to the widow.

Judgment

The writ petition filed by the Union of India was dismissed.
The High Court confirmed that the widow is entitled to special family pension, as her husband’s death was attributable to military service.
The ruling emphasized that soldiers remain on duty even during casual leave, ensuring their families are protected.

Significance of the Judgment

Protects Soldier’s Families: Ensures widows and dependents are not denied rightful pensions.
Clarifies Service Rules: Reinforces the legal position that casual leave is equivalent to active duty.
Strengthens Welfare Provisions: Recognizes the sacrifices of soldiers, even outside the barracks.
Sets a Precedent: Future cases of death or disability during leave can be linked to service for benefit entitlements.

Conclusion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court’s ruling is a landmark in protecting the rights of soldiers’ families. By affirming that death during casual leave is attributable to service, the judgment highlights the continuous nature of military duty and ensures that no family of a soldier is denied the benefits they deserve.