Major Decision on Pay Fixation for Re-employed Ex-Servicemen in Department of Posts
Thousands of re-employed Ex-Servicemen serving in Central Government departments have been fighting for their rightful pay fixation benefits for decades. To address this long-standing anomaly, a draft Office Memorandum (OM) has already been prepared proposing a uniform pay fixation framework for all ranks of Ex-Servicemen re-employed in Central Civil Services. In a significant development affecting thousands of ex-servicemen working in the Department of Posts, the Ministry of Communications, Department of Posts, has issued an important clarification regarding the applicability of Para 16(2) of the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986.
The order, issued on 20 January 2026, settles a long-pending issue concerning whether ex-servicemen re-employed as Postal Assistants (PA) and Sorting Assistants (SA) are entitled to special pay fixation benefits available to re-employed ex-combatant clerks.
The Department has concluded that the benefit under Para 16(2) cannot be extended to Postal Assistants and Sorting Assistants.
Background of the Issue
The matter had been under examination for several years. In April 2025, the Department of Posts had directed postal circles to maintain the status quo while seeking clarification from the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), the nodal authority on service matters.
After further consultation, DoPT reiterated that Para 16(2) specifically covers certain clerical and storekeeper posts and does not explicitly include Postal Assistants or Sorting Assistants.
Consequently, the Department of Posts conducted a detailed examination before arriving at its final decision.
What Does Para 16(2) Provide?
Para 16(2) of the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 provides a special method of pay fixation for certain categories of ex-servicemen re-employed in clerical and storekeeping positions in civilian government service.
Many ex-servicemen appointed as Postal Assistants and Sorting Assistants had sought extension of this benefit on the ground that they perform clerical functions.
However, the Department has now clarified that the provision does not automatically apply to these postal cadres.
Why Has the Benefit Been Denied?
The Department of Posts has cited several reasons for denying the extension of Para 16(2) benefits to Postal Assistants and Sorting Assistants.
1. Postal Assistants Are Not Mentioned in Para 16(2)
The foremost reason is that the relevant provision explicitly refers to clerical and storekeeper posts but does not mention Postal Assistants or Sorting Assistants. DoPT has also confirmed this interpretation.
2. Postal Assistants Have Historically Been a Higher Cadre
The Department compared the pay scales of Postal Assistants and Lower Division Clerks (LDCs), now known as Junior Secretariat Assistants (JSAs), across multiple Central Pay Commissions.
| Pay Commission | Postal Assistant/Sorting Assistant | LDC/JSA |
| 3rd CPC | Higher Scale | Lower Scale |
| 4th CPC | ₹975–1660 | ₹950–1400 |
| 5th CPC | ₹4000–6000 | ₹3050–4590 |
| 6th CPC | GP ₹2400 | GP ₹1900 |
| 7th CPC | Level-4 | Level-2 |
This comparison demonstrates that Postal Assistants have consistently occupied a higher pay level than clerical cadres covered under Para 16(2).
3. Higher Educational Qualifications
The Department also highlighted differences in recruitment standards:
- Earlier, Postal Assistants required Intermediate (10+2) qualification while LDCs required Matriculation.
- The 5th Central Pay Commission introduced computer knowledge requirements for Postal Assistants.
- Currently, Postal Assistants require Graduation as the minimum qualification.
- JSAs continue to require only 10+2 qualification.
These differences indicate that Postal Assistants constitute a distinct and higher category than ordinary clerical posts.
4. Historical Precedents Do Not Support the Claim
The Department examined previous government decisions involving ex-combatant clerks and noted that:
- Certain benefits were extended to clerks in specified pay scales.
- Similar benefits were later extended to Telegraphists and Telephone Operators.
- Despite having comparable pay scales, Postal Assistants and Sorting Assistants were never specifically included in those decisions.
This historical omission was considered significant while deciding the issue.
Final Decision of the Department of Posts
After examining recruitment rules, pay scales, educational qualifications, historical precedents, and DoPT clarifications, the Department of Posts has decided that:
The benefit of pay fixation under Para 16(2) of the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 shall not be extended to ex-servicemen re-employed as Postal Assistants or Sorting Assistants.
As a result, their pay will continue to be regulated under the general provisions contained in Paras 4 and 5 of the DoPT Office Memorandum dated 31 July 1986.
Relief for Employees Already Receiving the Benefit
The Department has, however, provided partial relief to affected employees.
No Recovery of Excess Payment
The order clearly states that where the benefit had already been granted in the past:
- No recovery of the excess amount paid shall be made.
- Employees will not be forced to refund the money already received.
Pay Will Be Re-fixed
Although recovery has been barred, the pay of such employees will be re-fixed according to the applicable rules under Paras 4 and 5 of the 1986 DoPT instructions.
Opportunity to Represent
Before re-fixation:
- A show-cause notice must be issued.
- Employees will be allowed to submit representations.
- Authorities must pass a reasoned and speaking order.
Waiver of Recovery in Exceptional Cases
The Department has also indicated that recovery waiver may be considered on a case-by-case basis in accordance with existing DoPT and Ministry of Finance guidelines.
Impact on Re-employed Ex-Servicemen
The decision is likely to affect a significant number of ex-servicemen who joined the Department of Posts as Postal Assistants or Sorting Assistants after retirement from the Armed Forces.
Key implications include:
- No future benefit under Para 16(2).
- Pay fixation to be governed by general re-employment rules.
- Existing beneficiaries may face downward pay re-fixation.
- No recovery of past payments already received.
- Scope for individual representations and legal remedies remains open.
Conclusion
The Department of Posts has finally resolved the long-standing controversy regarding the applicability of Para 16(2) of the CCS (Fixation of Pay of Re-employed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 to Postal Assistants and Sorting Assistants. Based on cadre structure, qualifications, pay scales, historical precedents, and DoPT’s interpretation, the Department has ruled that the special pay fixation benefit is not admissible to these categories.
While the decision closes the administrative debate, it may still become a subject of further representations and legal examination by affected ex-servicemen associations, particularly those who believe that Postal Assistants perform duties comparable to clerical cadres covered under the existing provisions.
For re-employed ex-servicemen, the order is both a clarification and a significant policy decision that will directly influence pay fixation, future increments, and retirement benefits.
Download PDF copy of orhe Order – DOWNLOAD